Peer Review Process

PHD (Publication of Health Data): During the evaluation phase, PHD engages authors, editors, section editors, and reviewers. In the evaluation process, PHD employs the Double-Blind Review model to safeguard confidentiality. Initially, each submitted manuscript undergoes an assessment by the editor. If the article aligns with the focus and scope of PHD, as well as adheres to the writing guidelines, it proceeds to the reviewer for an evaluation of its content and novelty. In cases where the manuscript does not meet these criteria, it is returned to the author. A minimum of 2 reviewers assess each document over a span of approximately 1-2 weeks, using the criteria outlined in the Article Assessment Form for Reviewers.